University of Derby Grading

University of Derby logo

University of Derby Grading

University of Derby Grading, Undergraduate marking scale

This scale applies to Levels 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the University Credit Framework. The descriptors are typical characteristics of the standard of work associated with each range of marks. The descriptors are illustrative and for guidance only. They are not comprehensive. A mark of 40% is regarded as a minimum pass. See Section B3.2 for level descriptors.

% mark Mark Descriptors
 
   

 

s Clas

 

 70-100% Excellent    
   Outstanding; high to very high standard; a high level of critical analysis andFirst
   evaluation, incisive original thinking; commendable originality; exceptionally well
   researched; high quality presentation; exceptional clarity of ideas; excellent
   coherence and logic. Trivial or very minor errors. For the highest marks (90 –
      
   100%): an exceptional standard of work illustrating thorough and in-depth   
   understanding, communicated with exceptional authority.   
 60-69% Very good SecondDiv1
   A very good standard; a very good level of critical analysis and evaluation; significant
   originality; well researched; a very good standard of presentation; commendable
   clarity of ideas; thoughtful and effective presentation; very good sense of coherence
   and logic; minor errors only.
      
        
 50-59% Good SecondDiv2
  A good standard; a fairly good level of critical analysis and evaluation; some
  
   evidence of original thinking or originality; quite well researched; a good standard of
   presentation; ideas generally clear and coherent, some evidence of
   misunderstandings; some deficiencies in presentation.
      
 40-49% Satisfactory    
  A sound standard of work; a fair level of critical analysis and evaluation; littleThird
  
   evidence of original thinking or originality; adequately researched; a sound standard
   of presentation; ideas fairly clear and coherent, some significant misunderstandings
   and errors; some weakness in style or presentation but satisfactory overall.   
       
 35-39% Unsatisfactory  MarginalFail 
   Overall marginally unsatisfactory; some sound aspects but some of the following  
   weaknesses are evident; inadequate critical analysis and evaluation; little evidence of  
   originality; not well researched; standard of presentation unacceptable; ideas unclear  
   and incoherent; some significant errors and misunderstandings. Marginal fail.  
       
 21-34% Poor    
   Below the pass standard; a poor critical analysis and evaluation; virtually no   
   evidence of originality; poorly researched; presentation unacceptable and not up   
   to  graduate  standard;  ideas  confused  and  incoherent,  some  serious   
   misunderstandings and errors. A clear fail, short of pass standard.   
       
 1-20% Very poor    
   Well below the passstandard, with many serious errors. Standard of presentation   
   totally unacceptable,incoherent and may be severely under- length. No evidence   
   of evaluation or application. A very clear fail, well short of the pass standard.   
    Fail
 NS Non-submission 
   No work has been submitted.   
      
 Z Academic offence notation   
   Applies to proven instances of academic offence.